Relatives' Anguish Over Coastal Degradation Threatening Coastal Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.
An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.
A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril
Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.
Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.